Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Change models
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.AIBudget
IndexAll categories, out of 100.
63.2 ±4.8 best
63.1 ±2.2
GapIndex points below the top.
Top
−0.1 · no clear gap
CoverageIndex weight that has results.
85%
100% best
SpeedOutput tokens per second.
—
122/s
EloLMArena rating and rank.
—
1471
ReleasedMonth of release.
2026-04
2026-08
Input / 1MUS dollars per 1M input tokens.
$5.00
$0.04 best
Output / 1MUS dollars per 1M output tokens.
$25.00
$0.078 best
1K chats2K tokens in, 500 out, each.
$22.50
$0.119 best
1K documents20K tokens in, 1K out, each.
$125.00
$0.876 best
1K agent tasks200K tokens in, 20K out, each.
$1,500.00
$9.55 best
ContextMaximum tokens in one request.
1M
1.05M best
AgenticMulti-step tasks with tools.
63.5
69.7 best
CodingCode writing and repair.
64.7 best
62.3
ReasoningLogic problems and puzzles.
60.7 best
58.9
MultimodalTasks with images and text.
60.4
65.0 best
KnowledgeFacts and expert knowledge.
69.1 best
57.7
MultilingualTasks in many languages.
—
64.0
InstructionTasks with strict prompt rules.
43.8 best
33.5
MathMath problems.
—
57.3

Benchmarks

4 shared
Only Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive): 25Only GLM-5.3-Flash: 86
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
GLM-5.3-Flash
91.0% best6 / 49
89.4%11 / 49
46.7%11 / 24
51.2% best4 / 24
83.1%15 / 21
84.3% best12 / 21
OfficeQA ProMultimodal
43.6%16 / 16
62.4% best10 / 16