Anthropic
partialShows if the model has enough results for an index.Claude Opus 4.6 Thinking Auto
Claude Opus 4.6 Thinking Auto is a model from Anthropic. 6 benchmarks count toward its score, in 6 categories.
IndexOverall score out of 100.Unranked
CoverageShare of the index weight with results.85%
SpeedOutput tokens per second.—
Input / 1MUS dollars per 1M input tokens.N/A
Output / 1MUS dollars per 1M output tokens.N/A
ContextMaximum tokens in one request.N/A
EloLMArena rating and rank.N/A
The index is a score out of 100. The ± range shows how much it can change.
CapabilitiesScore per category, out of 100.
Out of 100Results
6 counted| BenchmarkThe test name. | CategoryThe capability that the test measures. | ResultThe score from the publisher. | IndexThis result as a score out of 100. | RunThe settings of the run. | DateDate of the result. | Published byThe source of the result. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Mathematics | Math | 89.3% | 67.2 | high effort | 25 Jun 2026 | LiveBench |
| LiveBench Reasoning | Reasoning | 88.7% | 79.1 | high effort | 25 Jun 2026 | LiveBench |
| LiveBench Language | Knowledge | 83.3% | 71.0 | high effort | 25 Jun 2026 | LiveBench |
| LiveBench Coding | Coding | 78.2% | 67.5 | high effort | 25 Jun 2026 | LiveBench |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | Reasoning | 69.9% | 53.0 | high effort | 25 Jun 2026 | LiveBench |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | Instruction | 63.3% | 60.1 | high effort | 25 Jun 2026 | LiveBench |
| LiveBench Agentic Coding | Agentic | 49.0% | 62.8 | high effort | 25 Jun 2026 | LiveBench |
6 benchmarks count, from 7 of 7 results. A grey row does not count. Too few models took that benchmark.